2009 Symposium

Globalization, Families, and the State

Professor Maxine Eichner and Professor Deborah Weissman
Volume 88: Issue 5
The effects of globalization on markets and workers have been widely examined in the legal literature. However, the impact of globalization within households and upon families, and the response of the state, have not received adequate attention. This symposium will focus on issues related to globalization and families. Attention will be given principally to the United States, informed by an awareness of global interdependencies, and set within a larger comparative international framework as a means to examine the range of possible legal responses to these issues.

The globalization of the economy has placed unrelenting pressures on contemporary families. Throughout the industrialized world, marriage rates are declining, birth rates are falling, and hours that family members work outside the home are rising.

Globalization demands longer hours in the workplace, and inevitably results in competing and conflicting demands on time allocated to interpersonal relationships within households. Workplace demands strain the labor resources of families, taxing the ability of heads of households to care for young children and aging parents. Further, the stability in which families flourish is undermined by the flexibility that globalization requires, and the increasing entrepreneurialism demanded of workers.

Globalizations’ effects include the loss of state-sponsored social and regulatory programs, increased privatization of family carework, the marketization of the very creation of family, and changing social and economic relationships within families and communities. Government policies that promote the demands of the marketplace can exacerbate this tension between families and marketplace. In this symposium, we will examine the consequences of globalization on families and consider the effectiveness of different possible government responses to the difficulties that globalization poses for families.

Keynote Speakers

Morning: Lourdes Benería
Lunch: Kerry Rittich

Panelists

Panel 1: Globalization and the
Underinvestment in Families

Janine Brodie
Martha Fineman
Maxine Eichner
Molly Shanley
Panel 2: Marketization and Families
Barbara Fedders
Melissa Jacoby
Kim Krawiec
Janie Chuang
Martha Davis
Panel 3: Families and Global Migration
Jacqueline Hagan
Adam Feibelman
Deborah Weissman
Rhacel Salazar Parrenas
Leah Schmalzbauer

Articles

Coming soon…


2008 Symposium

Frontiers in Empirical Patent Law Scholarship

Professor Andrew Chin
Volume 87: Issue 5
Policymakers have urgently called for predictions and prescriptions regarding the effectiveness of the U.S. patent system in promoting 21st-century innovation in an international environment. In many cases, empirical scholarship can go beyond more traditional modes of legal analysis to identify significant problems and to propose concrete, feasible solutions.

The 2008 North Carolina Law Review Symposium will showcase the remarkable diversity of recent quantitative research on the patent system, and the potential for even broader and deeper interdisciplinary engagement on questions of innovation law and policy. Nationally recognized scholars in law, business and economics will be joined, for perhaps the first time in such a setting, by leading research scientists who have brought distinctive data sets, analytical methodologies, and stakeholder perspectives to their own examinations of the patent system. For all who attend, the resulting conversation is likely to be uniquely challenging and rewarding.

Sponsors

redhat
Kenyon & Kenyon
Jenkins, Wilson, Taylor & Hunt
UNC Graduate and Professional Student Federation

Panelists

The Hon. Jay Plager
Mark Calcagno
John Martin Conley
Christopher A. Cotropia
Jay P. Kesan
Xin Li
Scott A. Baker
Martin Campbell-Kelly
Colleen Chien
Andrew Chin
Mark Lemley
Arvind Malhotra
Jon F. Merz
Michael Meurer
Kristen Osenga
Glynn S. Lunney, Jr

Articles

Frontiers in Empirical Patent Law Scholarship
Andrew Chin

Keynote Address
Hon. S. Jay Plager

The Political Economy of the Patent System
Jay P. Kesan & Andres A. Gallo

Copying in Patent Law
Christopher A. Cotropia & Mark A. Lemley

Patents and Growth: Empirical Evidence From the States
Glynn S. Lunney, Jr.

University Software Ownership and Litigation: A First Examination
Arti K. Rai, John R. Allison & Bhaven N. Sampat

Of Trolls, Davids, Goliaths, and Kings: Narratives and Evidence in the Litigation of High-Tech Patents
Colleen V. Chien

Search for Tomorrow: Some Side Effects of Patent Office Automation
Andrew Chin

Patent Citation Networks Revisited: Signs of a Twenty-First Century Change
Katherine J. Strandburg, Gábor Csárdi, Jan Tobochnik & Péter Érdi & László Zalányi


2007 Symposium

Precedent and the Roberts Court

Professor Michael Gerhardt
Volume 86: Issue 5
October 26, 2007
Photos
Video
The symposium united prominent legal scholars and political scientists to discuss their different perspectives on the Roberts Court and its handling of precedent.  The extent to which the Court either does or should follow its precedents is one of the most controversial, divisive subjects in constitutional law.  It was the central focus of the confirmation hearings for both Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, and a central focus of the symposium will be on how these two new justices approach precedents generally and particularly those with which they disagree.  The symposium will feature different theories about the possible fates of some of the Court’s landmark decisions, such as Roe v. Wade.  It will also feature important discussions about the different methods employed in legal and social science studies of precedent in constitutional law.

Panels

Panel I:  Perspectives on the Doctrine of Constitutional Stare Decisis
Panel II:  Methodologies for Analyzing Precedent
Panel III:  The Big Picture, or External and Internal Influences on the Justices

Sponsors

The North Carolina Law Review
UNC Center for Law and Government
University of North Carolina School of Law

Panelists

Dr. Frank B. Cross
Richard H. Fallon
Pamela S. Karlan
Jack Knight
Neal Devins
Tracey E. George
David E. Klein
Michael Stokes Paulsen
Lee Epstein
Michael Gerhardt
John C. Harrison

Articles

Coming Soon…


2006 Symposium

High Poverty Schooling in America: Lessons in Second-Class Citizenship

Professor Michael Gerhardt
Volume 85: Issue 5
October 23, 2006
Photos
Video
Despite the promise of the 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education, many of our nation’s public schools and districts are becoming part of a two-tiered system of middle and upper class schools populated largely by white students, and high poverty schools populated largely by African-American and Latino students. The social and educational injustice is clear—academic performance and life outcomes are demonstrably poorer for students in high poverty schools. Less clear is what to do.This one-day conference will explore not only the best strategies to improve academic achievement, teacher quality and parental satisfaction in high poverty schools, but also will seek to generate more conversation about how educators, scholars and lawyers—as well as parents and communities—can help confront the nation’s growing tolerance for separate and unequal schools. Some of the nation’s best scholars and lawyers will share their latest findings and perspectives on the effects of high poverty schooling on students; the mechanisms of harm in high poverty schools; the limits and possibilities of legal remedies; and the most promising strategies to improving achievement in high poverty schools. Most panelists will also contribute a paper to the conference and selected papers will be published in a special 2007 symposium edition of The North Carolina Law Review.

Panels

Panel I: What Do We Know About High Poverty Schools?
Panel II: What Are the Mechanisms of High Poverty Disadvantage?
Panel III: What are the Limits and Possibilities ofLegal Remedies?
Panel IV: What are the Most Promising Strategies to Improving Achievement
in High Poverty Schools?

Sponsors

The North Carolina Law Review
UNC Center for Civil Rights
UNC Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity
UNC School of Education

Panelists

John Charles Boger
John Edwards
David Hinojosa
Helen Ladd
Henry Levin
Ashley Osment
Charles Payne
Jonathan Sher
Jomills Braddockis
Douglas Harris
Michael Heise
Timothy Knowles
Gloria Ladson-Billings
Michael Rebell
Russell Rumberger
Ross Wiener
Julius Chambers
William Darity
Thomas James
Richard Kahlenberg
Goodwin Liu
Howard Machtinger
Maria Robledo Montecel

Articles

Coming Soon…

Bookmark and Share