<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Statutory Interpretation in Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. v. Hinton and Why North Carolina Courts Should Apply Anti-Tax Avoidance Judicial Doctrines in Future Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nclawreview.net/2010/04/01/statutory-interpretation-in-wal-mart-stores-east-inc-v-hinton-and-why-north-carolina-courts-should-apply-anti-tax-avoidance-judicial-doctrines-in-future-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nclawreview.net/2010/04/01/statutory-interpretation-in-wal-mart-stores-east-inc-v-hinton-and-why-north-carolina-courts-should-apply-anti-tax-avoidance-judicial-doctrines-in-future-cases/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 22:20:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	</channel>
</rss>

